Cube AMS ZERO99 C:68X Race 29 vs Giant Anthem Advanced SL SE: which bike is right for you?

Compare ride character, intended rider, geometry, and fit. Add your measurements to see which bike suits you better and which size to choose on each.

Fit verdict: these frames put you in effectively the same position, so geometry will not decide this pair. What can: the sourced differences below and, once you enter your measurements, your size and setup on each frame.

Compare them for meCompare geometry and sizes

In one look

Cube AMS ZERO99 C:68X Race 29: cross-country geometry. Giant Anthem Advanced SL SE: cross-country geometry.

  • Across matched sizes, the frame fronts of Cube AMS ZERO99 C:68X Race 29 and Giant Anthem Advanced SL SE differ by only a few millimetres. Stem and spacer choices will have more effect on handlebar position.
  • The forward length of the frame is nearly the same across matched sizes.

The frame standards line up and we hold no sourced weight or performance claim that separates them. What is left to decide is your size and setup on each frame.

  • Price

    Giant Anthem Advanced SL SE is the dearer of the two, going by the cheapest build you can buy of each; Cube AMS ZERO99 C:68X Race 29 starts lower.

Subjective findings from independent tests on stock or near-stock builds. Tyres, pressure and size change how a frame feels.

We compare differences at frame and model level. Components, current price, and availability depend on the exact build and seller.

2026 • cross-country geometry
Cube AMS ZERO99 C:68X Race 29
Full size guide
2026 • cross-country geometry
Giant Anthem Advanced SL SE
Full size guide

Fit and size differences

Geometry does not separate these bikes: matched sizes put the rider in effectively the same position.

Typical difference across matched sizes: frame front height 1 mm, forward length 0 mm.

For a personal answer, the fit-and-size path uses your measurements to show only the relevant frame sizes. The full chart remains available as a reference.

View geometry for every size

How do Cube AMS ZERO99 C:68X Race 29 and Giant Anthem Advanced SL SE sizes compare?

See the closest size matches and the differences in stack, reach, and riding position.

Cube AMS ZERO99 C:68X Race 29
S
Stack 592, Reach 401
Giant Anthem Advanced SL SE
S
Stack 602, Reach 420

Stack: 10 mm taller

Reach: 19 mm longer

Cube AMS ZERO99 C:68X Race 29
M
Stack 601, Reach 423
Giant Anthem Advanced SL SE
S
Stack 602, Reach 420

Stack: practically identical

Reach: 3 mm shorter

Cube AMS ZERO99 C:68X Race 29
L
Stack 611, Reach 445
Giant Anthem Advanced SL SE
M
Stack 607, Reach 445

Stack: 4 mm lower

Reach: practically identical

Cube AMS ZERO99 C:68X Race 29
XL
Stack 625, Reach 466
Giant Anthem Advanced SL SE
L
Stack 616, Reach 465

Stack: 9 mm lower

Reach: practically identical

The same size label can create a different position on each frame. Stack and reach are one part of the decision; the personalized comparison connects them to your body and each bike’s ride character.

FAQ

Can the same rider take different sizes on these two bikes?
Yes. Frame labels are not standardized, so the same rider may need different sizes. This comparison deliberately avoids a generic matched-size answer and hands your measurements to Bike Fit instead.
Which frame has the higher front: Cube AMS ZERO99 C:68X Race 29 or Giant Anthem Advanced SL SE?
Across matched sizes, the frame fronts of Cube AMS ZERO99 C:68X Race 29 and Giant Anthem Advanced SL SE differ by only a few millimetres. Stem and spacer choices will have more effect on handlebar position.

TrainCraft plans

Build training around the week you actually have

Set a goal, choose when you can ride, and get a structured plan that adjusts as your fatigue and availability change.

Build a free planView pricing