- Canyon Aeroad CF SLX
- 2XS
- Stack 498, Reach 372
- TIME Alpe d'Huez Disc
- XS
- Stack 514, Reach 372
Stack: 16 mm taller
Reach: practically identical
Compare ride character, intended rider, geometry, and fit. Add your measurements to see which bike suits you better and which size to choose on each.
Fit verdict: the frame positions differ enough to matter. Compare the geometry below, then use your measurements to identify the safer size and setup.
Canyon Aeroad CF SLX: race geometry. TIME Alpe d'Huez Disc: race geometry.
For the Canyon Aeroad CF SLX in 2XL there is no TIME Alpe d'Huez Disc size with a comparable position: the range simply does not reach there.
These two split on bottom bracket; the sourced values are below. What each difference means for your size, your setup and the riding you describe is in the full comparison.
A threaded bottom bracket is simpler to service and less prone to creaking; press fit saves weight and allows a wider shell.
TIME Alpe d'Huez Disc is the dearer of the two, going by the cheapest build you can buy of each; Canyon Aeroad CF SLX starts lower.
Subjective findings from independent tests on stock or near-stock builds. Tyres, pressure and size change how a frame feels.
We compare differences at frame and model level. Components, current price, and availability depend on the exact build and seller.
Start with the decision you are making. We will ask only for the details needed to answer it.
Step 1/1
Your answer decides which questions follow and what the result focuses on.
Geometry can separate these bikes: matched sizes create a meaningfully different position.
Typical difference across matched sizes: frame front height 1 mm, forward length 10 mm.
For a personal answer, the fit-and-size path uses your measurements to show only the relevant frame sizes. The full chart remains available as a reference.
See the closest size matches and the differences in stack, reach, and riding position.
Stack: 16 mm taller
Reach: practically identical
Stack: 7 mm lower
Reach: 6 mm shorter
Stack: practically identical
Reach: 13 mm shorter
Stack: practically identical
Reach: 10 mm shorter
Stack: practically identical
Reach: 9 mm shorter
Stack: 5 mm lower
Reach: 22 mm shorter
Stack: 23 mm lower
Reach: 32 mm shorter
The same size label can create a different position on each frame. Stack and reach are one part of the decision; the personalized comparison connects them to your body and each bike’s ride character.
TrainCraft training
Read training guides by goal and preparation roadmaps for cycling events, and use free structured workouts with .zwo export. Training plans are part of PRO. Adaptive plan changes that you review and apply are part of PRO AI.